One thing you learn when tasting wines on a regular basis is that price does not necessarily equal quality. Granted, it often does, but it isn't uncommon to be disappointed in an expensive bottle of wine, and unexpectedly delighted with a really inexpensive bottle.
With this knowledge in mind, and as we happened to be shopping at Trader Joe's last night, we decided to purchase some Charles Shaw wine. That's right: "Two Buck Chuck," as it is so lovingly called by its many admirers. (This due to the fact that in most places you can buy it for $1.99 per bottle, although in Virginia a bottle will actually cost you $3.29. Taxes or something...). After all, everyone seems to be raving about it, and at $3.29 it seemed to be worth the risk.
It wasn't. Last night we opened the 2006 Shiraz and were disappointed from the start. Upon opening the bottle, the first thought that came to mind when inhaling the aroma was one of soggy bread. The smell didn't improve much when the wine hit the glass. The bread aroma dissipated to some extent after a while, only to be replaced by the smell of mildew, accompanied by hints of rubbing alcohol. Overall, we rated the smell of the wine a D.
Now, a bad-smelling wine can still taste good, but we weren't so lucky with this one. I drank two half-glasses to try and figure out what flavors there were (Stephy couldn't, or simply didn't want to, stomach more than a few sips), but the feelings of bitterness on the sides of the tongue and harshness on the back of the tongue overrode any flavors that might have otherwise made the wine enjoyable to drink. It really had an all-around flavor of sour fruit, though which fruit it may have been was indistinguishable (perhaps cherry, or even orange? I really couldn't tell). The taste rated a D, which gives the wine itself an overall D rating.
As far as texture goes, the wine was very thin, or light-bodied, and had virtually no viscosity - it swirled in the glass like water.
One last thought: the atmosphere in which one drinks a wine can honestly profoundly affect how much you enjoy it. Some defenders of Chuck may be interested to know that we drank the wine unaccompanied by food (which may have made it more palatable), and while watching the original "Planet of the Apes," starring Charlton Heston. "Ah ha!" you may be thinking, "those 'damned dirty apes' could ruin anything!" Well, think again - I actually enjoyed the film. Much much more than the wine, in fact.
In this case, the old adage "you get what you pay for" certainly rang true. I can't say I'm looking forward to the bottle of Charles Shaw Cabernet Sauvignon that we also purchased, but then again, one never knows. We'll let you know how that one goes when we get to it.